Isomerism in Coordination Compounds
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321944 Assertion :
Complexes of \(\mathrm{MX}_{6}\) and \(\mathrm{MX}_{5} \mathrm{~L}\) type (X and \(\mathrm{L}\) are unidentate) do not show geometrical isomerism.
Reason :
Geometrical isomerism is not shown by complexes of coordination number 6 .

1 Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.
2 Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
3 Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
4 Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321945 Assertion :
The geometrical isomers of the complex \(\left[\mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\right]\) are optically inactive.
Reason :
Both geometrical isomers of the complex \(\left[\mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\right]\) possess axis of symmetry.

1 Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.
2 Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
3 Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
4 Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct.
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321946 Type of isomerism which is shown by \(\left[\mathrm{PtCl}_{2} \mathrm{Br}_{2}\right]^{2-}\) is also observed in

1 \(\left[\mathrm{CoCl}_{2} \mathrm{Br}_{2}\right]^{2-}\)
2 \(\left[\operatorname{Co}(\mathrm{en})_{3}\right]^{3+}\)
3 \(\left[\mathrm{PtCl}_{4} \mathrm{Br}_{2}\right]^{2-}\)
4 \(\left[\mathrm{PtCl}_{3}\left(\mathrm{NO}_{2}\right)\right]^{2-}\)
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321947 The metal atom present in the complex MABXL (where \({\mathrm{\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}, \mathrm{X}}}\) and L are unidentate ligands and M is metal) involves \({\mathrm{\mathrm{sp}^{3}}}\) hybridisation. The number of geometrical isomers exhibited by the complex is

1 4
2 2
3 3
4 0
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321944 Assertion :
Complexes of \(\mathrm{MX}_{6}\) and \(\mathrm{MX}_{5} \mathrm{~L}\) type (X and \(\mathrm{L}\) are unidentate) do not show geometrical isomerism.
Reason :
Geometrical isomerism is not shown by complexes of coordination number 6 .

1 Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.
2 Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
3 Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
4 Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321945 Assertion :
The geometrical isomers of the complex \(\left[\mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\right]\) are optically inactive.
Reason :
Both geometrical isomers of the complex \(\left[\mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\right]\) possess axis of symmetry.

1 Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.
2 Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
3 Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
4 Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct.
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321946 Type of isomerism which is shown by \(\left[\mathrm{PtCl}_{2} \mathrm{Br}_{2}\right]^{2-}\) is also observed in

1 \(\left[\mathrm{CoCl}_{2} \mathrm{Br}_{2}\right]^{2-}\)
2 \(\left[\operatorname{Co}(\mathrm{en})_{3}\right]^{3+}\)
3 \(\left[\mathrm{PtCl}_{4} \mathrm{Br}_{2}\right]^{2-}\)
4 \(\left[\mathrm{PtCl}_{3}\left(\mathrm{NO}_{2}\right)\right]^{2-}\)
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321947 The metal atom present in the complex MABXL (where \({\mathrm{\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}, \mathrm{X}}}\) and L are unidentate ligands and M is metal) involves \({\mathrm{\mathrm{sp}^{3}}}\) hybridisation. The number of geometrical isomers exhibited by the complex is

1 4
2 2
3 3
4 0
NEET Test Series from KOTA - 10 Papers In MS WORD WhatsApp Here
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321944 Assertion :
Complexes of \(\mathrm{MX}_{6}\) and \(\mathrm{MX}_{5} \mathrm{~L}\) type (X and \(\mathrm{L}\) are unidentate) do not show geometrical isomerism.
Reason :
Geometrical isomerism is not shown by complexes of coordination number 6 .

1 Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.
2 Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
3 Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
4 Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321945 Assertion :
The geometrical isomers of the complex \(\left[\mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\right]\) are optically inactive.
Reason :
Both geometrical isomers of the complex \(\left[\mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\right]\) possess axis of symmetry.

1 Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.
2 Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
3 Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
4 Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct.
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321946 Type of isomerism which is shown by \(\left[\mathrm{PtCl}_{2} \mathrm{Br}_{2}\right]^{2-}\) is also observed in

1 \(\left[\mathrm{CoCl}_{2} \mathrm{Br}_{2}\right]^{2-}\)
2 \(\left[\operatorname{Co}(\mathrm{en})_{3}\right]^{3+}\)
3 \(\left[\mathrm{PtCl}_{4} \mathrm{Br}_{2}\right]^{2-}\)
4 \(\left[\mathrm{PtCl}_{3}\left(\mathrm{NO}_{2}\right)\right]^{2-}\)
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321947 The metal atom present in the complex MABXL (where \({\mathrm{\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}, \mathrm{X}}}\) and L are unidentate ligands and M is metal) involves \({\mathrm{\mathrm{sp}^{3}}}\) hybridisation. The number of geometrical isomers exhibited by the complex is

1 4
2 2
3 3
4 0
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321944 Assertion :
Complexes of \(\mathrm{MX}_{6}\) and \(\mathrm{MX}_{5} \mathrm{~L}\) type (X and \(\mathrm{L}\) are unidentate) do not show geometrical isomerism.
Reason :
Geometrical isomerism is not shown by complexes of coordination number 6 .

1 Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.
2 Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
3 Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
4 Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321945 Assertion :
The geometrical isomers of the complex \(\left[\mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\right]\) are optically inactive.
Reason :
Both geometrical isomers of the complex \(\left[\mathrm{M}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{4} \mathrm{Cl}_{2}\right]\) possess axis of symmetry.

1 Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.
2 Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
3 Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
4 Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct.
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321946 Type of isomerism which is shown by \(\left[\mathrm{PtCl}_{2} \mathrm{Br}_{2}\right]^{2-}\) is also observed in

1 \(\left[\mathrm{CoCl}_{2} \mathrm{Br}_{2}\right]^{2-}\)
2 \(\left[\operatorname{Co}(\mathrm{en})_{3}\right]^{3+}\)
3 \(\left[\mathrm{PtCl}_{4} \mathrm{Br}_{2}\right]^{2-}\)
4 \(\left[\mathrm{PtCl}_{3}\left(\mathrm{NO}_{2}\right)\right]^{2-}\)
CHXII09:COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

321947 The metal atom present in the complex MABXL (where \({\mathrm{\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}, \mathrm{X}}}\) and L are unidentate ligands and M is metal) involves \({\mathrm{\mathrm{sp}^{3}}}\) hybridisation. The number of geometrical isomers exhibited by the complex is

1 4
2 2
3 3
4 0