318074 Possible products \({\text{(A)}}\xrightarrow{{{\text{B}}{{\text{r}}_{\text{2}}}{\text{/CC}}{{\text{l}}_{\text{4}}}}}{\text{(B)}}\) products The (A+B) is:
1 10
2 8
3 6
4 2
Explanation:
CHXI13:HYDROCARBONS
318075
What are \({\text{X}}\) and \({\text{Y}}\) in the reaction, \(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{4}+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4} \xrightarrow{80^{\circ} \mathrm{C}} X \xrightarrow[\Delta]{\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}} \mathrm{Y}\)
318076
\(\begin{aligned} \mathrm{CH}_{3}-\mathrm{CH}= & \underset{\text { | }}{\mathrm{C}}-\mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{3} \\ & \mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{3}\end{aligned}\) IUPAC name of the compound with the above structure is
1 3-n-propyl-3-hexene
2 3-n-propyl-2-hexene
3 3-ethyl-2-hexene
4 4-ethyl-4-hexene.
Explanation:
3 - Ethyl - 2 - hexene
CHXI13:HYDROCARBONS
318077
Assertion : In Baeyer's oxidation of ethene, \(\mathrm{sp}^{2}\) carbon is changed to \(\mathrm{sp}^{3}\) carbon. Reason : Cold dil. alk. \(\mathrm{KMnO}_{4}\) is Baeyer's reagent.
1 Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.
2 Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
3 Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
4 Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.
Explanation:
Upon treating ethene, \(\mathrm{sp}^{2}\) hybridised with Baeyer's reagent (cold dilute \(\mathrm{KMnO}_{4}\) ) produces ethylene glycol, \(\mathrm{sp}^{3}\) hybridised.
NEET Test Series from KOTA - 10 Papers In MS WORD
WhatsApp Here
CHXI13:HYDROCARBONS
318074 Possible products \({\text{(A)}}\xrightarrow{{{\text{B}}{{\text{r}}_{\text{2}}}{\text{/CC}}{{\text{l}}_{\text{4}}}}}{\text{(B)}}\) products The (A+B) is:
1 10
2 8
3 6
4 2
Explanation:
CHXI13:HYDROCARBONS
318075
What are \({\text{X}}\) and \({\text{Y}}\) in the reaction, \(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{4}+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4} \xrightarrow{80^{\circ} \mathrm{C}} X \xrightarrow[\Delta]{\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}} \mathrm{Y}\)
318076
\(\begin{aligned} \mathrm{CH}_{3}-\mathrm{CH}= & \underset{\text { | }}{\mathrm{C}}-\mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{3} \\ & \mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{3}\end{aligned}\) IUPAC name of the compound with the above structure is
1 3-n-propyl-3-hexene
2 3-n-propyl-2-hexene
3 3-ethyl-2-hexene
4 4-ethyl-4-hexene.
Explanation:
3 - Ethyl - 2 - hexene
CHXI13:HYDROCARBONS
318077
Assertion : In Baeyer's oxidation of ethene, \(\mathrm{sp}^{2}\) carbon is changed to \(\mathrm{sp}^{3}\) carbon. Reason : Cold dil. alk. \(\mathrm{KMnO}_{4}\) is Baeyer's reagent.
1 Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.
2 Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
3 Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
4 Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.
Explanation:
Upon treating ethene, \(\mathrm{sp}^{2}\) hybridised with Baeyer's reagent (cold dilute \(\mathrm{KMnO}_{4}\) ) produces ethylene glycol, \(\mathrm{sp}^{3}\) hybridised.
318074 Possible products \({\text{(A)}}\xrightarrow{{{\text{B}}{{\text{r}}_{\text{2}}}{\text{/CC}}{{\text{l}}_{\text{4}}}}}{\text{(B)}}\) products The (A+B) is:
1 10
2 8
3 6
4 2
Explanation:
CHXI13:HYDROCARBONS
318075
What are \({\text{X}}\) and \({\text{Y}}\) in the reaction, \(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{4}+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4} \xrightarrow{80^{\circ} \mathrm{C}} X \xrightarrow[\Delta]{\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}} \mathrm{Y}\)
318076
\(\begin{aligned} \mathrm{CH}_{3}-\mathrm{CH}= & \underset{\text { | }}{\mathrm{C}}-\mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{3} \\ & \mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{3}\end{aligned}\) IUPAC name of the compound with the above structure is
1 3-n-propyl-3-hexene
2 3-n-propyl-2-hexene
3 3-ethyl-2-hexene
4 4-ethyl-4-hexene.
Explanation:
3 - Ethyl - 2 - hexene
CHXI13:HYDROCARBONS
318077
Assertion : In Baeyer's oxidation of ethene, \(\mathrm{sp}^{2}\) carbon is changed to \(\mathrm{sp}^{3}\) carbon. Reason : Cold dil. alk. \(\mathrm{KMnO}_{4}\) is Baeyer's reagent.
1 Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.
2 Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
3 Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
4 Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.
Explanation:
Upon treating ethene, \(\mathrm{sp}^{2}\) hybridised with Baeyer's reagent (cold dilute \(\mathrm{KMnO}_{4}\) ) produces ethylene glycol, \(\mathrm{sp}^{3}\) hybridised.
318074 Possible products \({\text{(A)}}\xrightarrow{{{\text{B}}{{\text{r}}_{\text{2}}}{\text{/CC}}{{\text{l}}_{\text{4}}}}}{\text{(B)}}\) products The (A+B) is:
1 10
2 8
3 6
4 2
Explanation:
CHXI13:HYDROCARBONS
318075
What are \({\text{X}}\) and \({\text{Y}}\) in the reaction, \(\mathrm{C}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{4}+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{SO}_{4} \xrightarrow{80^{\circ} \mathrm{C}} X \xrightarrow[\Delta]{\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}} \mathrm{Y}\)
318076
\(\begin{aligned} \mathrm{CH}_{3}-\mathrm{CH}= & \underset{\text { | }}{\mathrm{C}}-\mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{3} \\ & \mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{2}-\mathrm{CH}_{3}\end{aligned}\) IUPAC name of the compound with the above structure is
1 3-n-propyl-3-hexene
2 3-n-propyl-2-hexene
3 3-ethyl-2-hexene
4 4-ethyl-4-hexene.
Explanation:
3 - Ethyl - 2 - hexene
CHXI13:HYDROCARBONS
318077
Assertion : In Baeyer's oxidation of ethene, \(\mathrm{sp}^{2}\) carbon is changed to \(\mathrm{sp}^{3}\) carbon. Reason : Cold dil. alk. \(\mathrm{KMnO}_{4}\) is Baeyer's reagent.
1 Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of the Assertion.
2 Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of the Assertion.
3 Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect.
4 Assertion is incorrect but reason is correct.
Explanation:
Upon treating ethene, \(\mathrm{sp}^{2}\) hybridised with Baeyer's reagent (cold dilute \(\mathrm{KMnO}_{4}\) ) produces ethylene glycol, \(\mathrm{sp}^{3}\) hybridised.