116795
Let be a relation from the set , 3.........,60 to itself such that pq, where are prime numbers . Then the number of elements in is :
1 600
2 660
3 540
4 720
Explanation:
B Given set, And, function Number of possible values of for So, the number of elements in is .
Shift-I
Sets, Relation and Function
116796
Let denote the power set of , 3....,10 . Define the relation and on as if and if . Then
1 both and are not equivalence relations
2 only is an equivalence relation
3 only is an equivalence relation
4 both and are equivalence relations
Explanation:
D P (S) = power set Given, and is an equivalence relation. is an equivalence relation. Hence, and are equivalence relation.
Shift-II
Sets, Relation and Function
116797
Let a relation in the set of natural numbers be defined as N. The relation is
1 reflexive
2 symmetric
3 transitive
4 an equivalence relation
Explanation:
A We have - For reflexive - Let, So, is reflective For symmetric - Hence, is not symmetric so given relation is reflexive.
AMU-2009
Sets, Relation and Function
116798
Let be a relation from (set of real numbers) to defined by and is an irrational number . The relation is
1 an equivalence relation
2 reflexive only
3 symmetric only
4 transitive only
Explanation:
A Given, And, is an irrational number. For reflexive relation - Then, And, Therefore is reflexive. For symmetric relation - Let, is an irrational number b, Therefore is symmetric. For transitive relation - Let and is an irrational number Now, is an also irrational number Thus is transitive relation Hence, is an equivalence relation.
116795
Let be a relation from the set , 3.........,60 to itself such that pq, where are prime numbers . Then the number of elements in is :
1 600
2 660
3 540
4 720
Explanation:
B Given set, And, function Number of possible values of for So, the number of elements in is .
Shift-I
Sets, Relation and Function
116796
Let denote the power set of , 3....,10 . Define the relation and on as if and if . Then
1 both and are not equivalence relations
2 only is an equivalence relation
3 only is an equivalence relation
4 both and are equivalence relations
Explanation:
D P (S) = power set Given, and is an equivalence relation. is an equivalence relation. Hence, and are equivalence relation.
Shift-II
Sets, Relation and Function
116797
Let a relation in the set of natural numbers be defined as N. The relation is
1 reflexive
2 symmetric
3 transitive
4 an equivalence relation
Explanation:
A We have - For reflexive - Let, So, is reflective For symmetric - Hence, is not symmetric so given relation is reflexive.
AMU-2009
Sets, Relation and Function
116798
Let be a relation from (set of real numbers) to defined by and is an irrational number . The relation is
1 an equivalence relation
2 reflexive only
3 symmetric only
4 transitive only
Explanation:
A Given, And, is an irrational number. For reflexive relation - Then, And, Therefore is reflexive. For symmetric relation - Let, is an irrational number b, Therefore is symmetric. For transitive relation - Let and is an irrational number Now, is an also irrational number Thus is transitive relation Hence, is an equivalence relation.
116795
Let be a relation from the set , 3.........,60 to itself such that pq, where are prime numbers . Then the number of elements in is :
1 600
2 660
3 540
4 720
Explanation:
B Given set, And, function Number of possible values of for So, the number of elements in is .
Shift-I
Sets, Relation and Function
116796
Let denote the power set of , 3....,10 . Define the relation and on as if and if . Then
1 both and are not equivalence relations
2 only is an equivalence relation
3 only is an equivalence relation
4 both and are equivalence relations
Explanation:
D P (S) = power set Given, and is an equivalence relation. is an equivalence relation. Hence, and are equivalence relation.
Shift-II
Sets, Relation and Function
116797
Let a relation in the set of natural numbers be defined as N. The relation is
1 reflexive
2 symmetric
3 transitive
4 an equivalence relation
Explanation:
A We have - For reflexive - Let, So, is reflective For symmetric - Hence, is not symmetric so given relation is reflexive.
AMU-2009
Sets, Relation and Function
116798
Let be a relation from (set of real numbers) to defined by and is an irrational number . The relation is
1 an equivalence relation
2 reflexive only
3 symmetric only
4 transitive only
Explanation:
A Given, And, is an irrational number. For reflexive relation - Then, And, Therefore is reflexive. For symmetric relation - Let, is an irrational number b, Therefore is symmetric. For transitive relation - Let and is an irrational number Now, is an also irrational number Thus is transitive relation Hence, is an equivalence relation.
NEET Test Series from KOTA - 10 Papers In MS WORD
WhatsApp Here
Sets, Relation and Function
116795
Let be a relation from the set , 3.........,60 to itself such that pq, where are prime numbers . Then the number of elements in is :
1 600
2 660
3 540
4 720
Explanation:
B Given set, And, function Number of possible values of for So, the number of elements in is .
Shift-I
Sets, Relation and Function
116796
Let denote the power set of , 3....,10 . Define the relation and on as if and if . Then
1 both and are not equivalence relations
2 only is an equivalence relation
3 only is an equivalence relation
4 both and are equivalence relations
Explanation:
D P (S) = power set Given, and is an equivalence relation. is an equivalence relation. Hence, and are equivalence relation.
Shift-II
Sets, Relation and Function
116797
Let a relation in the set of natural numbers be defined as N. The relation is
1 reflexive
2 symmetric
3 transitive
4 an equivalence relation
Explanation:
A We have - For reflexive - Let, So, is reflective For symmetric - Hence, is not symmetric so given relation is reflexive.
AMU-2009
Sets, Relation and Function
116798
Let be a relation from (set of real numbers) to defined by and is an irrational number . The relation is
1 an equivalence relation
2 reflexive only
3 symmetric only
4 transitive only
Explanation:
A Given, And, is an irrational number. For reflexive relation - Then, And, Therefore is reflexive. For symmetric relation - Let, is an irrational number b, Therefore is symmetric. For transitive relation - Let and is an irrational number Now, is an also irrational number Thus is transitive relation Hence, is an equivalence relation.