241200
Which of the following statements about Judiciary is false?
1 Every law passed by the Parliament needs judicial approval
2 Judiciary can strike down a law if it goes against the spirit of Indian Constitution
3 Judiciary is independent of the executive
4 Any citizen can approach the court if his/ her rights are violated
Explanation:
Every law passed by the Parliament needs judicial approval
09. Judiciary
241201
The Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court dose not involve___?
1 Criminal Cases
2 Cases involving interpretation of the Constitution
3 Civil Cases
4 Disputes arising out of pre-Constitution treaties and agreements
Explanation:
Disputes arising out of pre-Constitution treaties and agreements
09. Judiciary
241202
Assertion (A): The mid-day meal that children now receive in government and government-aided schools is because of a PIL Reason (R): the Supreme Court in the early 1980s devised a mechanism of Public Interest Litigation or PIL to increase access to justice.
1 Both A and R are wrong
2 Only A is correct
3 Both A and R are correct but R is not correct explanation of A
4 Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
Explanation:
Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
09. Judiciary
241204
Mid-day meal is given in government-aided schools because of ______________.
1 Supreme Court
2 FIR
3 PIL
4 All of these
Explanation:
PIL In April 2001, the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) initiated the public interest litigation (Civil) No. 196/2001, People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India & Others – popularly known as the "right to food" case. The PUCL argued that Article 21 – "right to life" of the Indian Constitution when read together with Articles 39(a) and 47, makes the right to food a derived fundamental right which is enforceable by virtue of the constitutional remedy provided under Article 32 of the constitution. The PUCL argued that excess food stocks with the Food Corporation of India should be fed to hungry citizens. This included providing mid-day meals in primary schools. The scheme came into force with the supreme court order dated 28 November 2001, which required all government and government-assisted primary schools to provide cooked midday meals.
241200
Which of the following statements about Judiciary is false?
1 Every law passed by the Parliament needs judicial approval
2 Judiciary can strike down a law if it goes against the spirit of Indian Constitution
3 Judiciary is independent of the executive
4 Any citizen can approach the court if his/ her rights are violated
Explanation:
Every law passed by the Parliament needs judicial approval
09. Judiciary
241201
The Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court dose not involve___?
1 Criminal Cases
2 Cases involving interpretation of the Constitution
3 Civil Cases
4 Disputes arising out of pre-Constitution treaties and agreements
Explanation:
Disputes arising out of pre-Constitution treaties and agreements
09. Judiciary
241202
Assertion (A): The mid-day meal that children now receive in government and government-aided schools is because of a PIL Reason (R): the Supreme Court in the early 1980s devised a mechanism of Public Interest Litigation or PIL to increase access to justice.
1 Both A and R are wrong
2 Only A is correct
3 Both A and R are correct but R is not correct explanation of A
4 Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
Explanation:
Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
09. Judiciary
241204
Mid-day meal is given in government-aided schools because of ______________.
1 Supreme Court
2 FIR
3 PIL
4 All of these
Explanation:
PIL In April 2001, the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) initiated the public interest litigation (Civil) No. 196/2001, People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India & Others – popularly known as the "right to food" case. The PUCL argued that Article 21 – "right to life" of the Indian Constitution when read together with Articles 39(a) and 47, makes the right to food a derived fundamental right which is enforceable by virtue of the constitutional remedy provided under Article 32 of the constitution. The PUCL argued that excess food stocks with the Food Corporation of India should be fed to hungry citizens. This included providing mid-day meals in primary schools. The scheme came into force with the supreme court order dated 28 November 2001, which required all government and government-assisted primary schools to provide cooked midday meals.
241200
Which of the following statements about Judiciary is false?
1 Every law passed by the Parliament needs judicial approval
2 Judiciary can strike down a law if it goes against the spirit of Indian Constitution
3 Judiciary is independent of the executive
4 Any citizen can approach the court if his/ her rights are violated
Explanation:
Every law passed by the Parliament needs judicial approval
09. Judiciary
241201
The Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court dose not involve___?
1 Criminal Cases
2 Cases involving interpretation of the Constitution
3 Civil Cases
4 Disputes arising out of pre-Constitution treaties and agreements
Explanation:
Disputes arising out of pre-Constitution treaties and agreements
09. Judiciary
241202
Assertion (A): The mid-day meal that children now receive in government and government-aided schools is because of a PIL Reason (R): the Supreme Court in the early 1980s devised a mechanism of Public Interest Litigation or PIL to increase access to justice.
1 Both A and R are wrong
2 Only A is correct
3 Both A and R are correct but R is not correct explanation of A
4 Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
Explanation:
Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
09. Judiciary
241204
Mid-day meal is given in government-aided schools because of ______________.
1 Supreme Court
2 FIR
3 PIL
4 All of these
Explanation:
PIL In April 2001, the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) initiated the public interest litigation (Civil) No. 196/2001, People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India & Others – popularly known as the "right to food" case. The PUCL argued that Article 21 – "right to life" of the Indian Constitution when read together with Articles 39(a) and 47, makes the right to food a derived fundamental right which is enforceable by virtue of the constitutional remedy provided under Article 32 of the constitution. The PUCL argued that excess food stocks with the Food Corporation of India should be fed to hungry citizens. This included providing mid-day meals in primary schools. The scheme came into force with the supreme court order dated 28 November 2001, which required all government and government-assisted primary schools to provide cooked midday meals.
241200
Which of the following statements about Judiciary is false?
1 Every law passed by the Parliament needs judicial approval
2 Judiciary can strike down a law if it goes against the spirit of Indian Constitution
3 Judiciary is independent of the executive
4 Any citizen can approach the court if his/ her rights are violated
Explanation:
Every law passed by the Parliament needs judicial approval
09. Judiciary
241201
The Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court dose not involve___?
1 Criminal Cases
2 Cases involving interpretation of the Constitution
3 Civil Cases
4 Disputes arising out of pre-Constitution treaties and agreements
Explanation:
Disputes arising out of pre-Constitution treaties and agreements
09. Judiciary
241202
Assertion (A): The mid-day meal that children now receive in government and government-aided schools is because of a PIL Reason (R): the Supreme Court in the early 1980s devised a mechanism of Public Interest Litigation or PIL to increase access to justice.
1 Both A and R are wrong
2 Only A is correct
3 Both A and R are correct but R is not correct explanation of A
4 Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
Explanation:
Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
09. Judiciary
241204
Mid-day meal is given in government-aided schools because of ______________.
1 Supreme Court
2 FIR
3 PIL
4 All of these
Explanation:
PIL In April 2001, the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) initiated the public interest litigation (Civil) No. 196/2001, People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India & Others – popularly known as the "right to food" case. The PUCL argued that Article 21 – "right to life" of the Indian Constitution when read together with Articles 39(a) and 47, makes the right to food a derived fundamental right which is enforceable by virtue of the constitutional remedy provided under Article 32 of the constitution. The PUCL argued that excess food stocks with the Food Corporation of India should be fed to hungry citizens. This included providing mid-day meals in primary schools. The scheme came into force with the supreme court order dated 28 November 2001, which required all government and government-assisted primary schools to provide cooked midday meals.
